ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2025
External Validation of the COMI-Hernia Score and Establishing Minimal Important Difference for Assessing Postoperative Quality of Life Following Inguinal Hernia Repair.
Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inguinal hernia repair significantly affects patient quality of life and healthcare costs. The systematic assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) emphasizes the importance of valid and responsive measurement tools. Objective: To externally validate the Core Outcome Measure Index for hernia surgery (COMI-Hernia) and determine its Minimal Important Difference (MID) using an anchor-based approach. Methods: Data from 240 patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair between 2018 and 2020 were analyzed (Asklepios Klinik Langen, Germany). The patients completed the COMI-Hernia questionnaire preoperatively and at multiple postoperative intervals (up to 24 months). Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness were assessed, and MID values were calculated using the Patient Global Impression of Change. Results: The COMI-Hernia assessment showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83), strong construct validity [visual analog scale (VAS) correlation r = 0.728], and excellent responsiveness (standardized response mean = 1.26). MID values were established as 0.5 points for pain and 0.7 points for function. The greatest improvement occurred within the first 3 months and remained stable for up to 24 months. MID thresholds were identified as 0.5 points for pain and 0.7 points for function. Conclusions: COMI-Hernia provides a reliable, valid, and responsive assessment of PROs following inguinal hernia surgery. Defined MID values facilitate meaningful interpretations in clinical practice and research. Future studies should investigate the psychosocial variables, sex-specific differences, and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.