Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41451121›Full record

ReviewAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025

Post-Mastectomy Direct-to-Implant Pre-Pectoral Breast Reconstruction With Polyurethane-Coated Implants: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety.

Edoardo Caimi, Stefano Vaccari, Simone Furlan, Federico Corsi, Roberta Comunian, Riccardo Di Giuli, Valeria Bandi, Barbara Catania, Alessandra Veronesi, Francesco Klinger and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-pectoral (PP) direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction has gained popularity as a muscle-sparing alternative to subpectoral techniques. Polyurethane-coated implants, with their unique mechanical and biological properties, may further optimize outcomes by reducing capsular contracture and improving implant stability. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and patient-reported outcomes of post-mastectomy PP DTI breast reconstruction using polyurethane-coated implants. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Data on study design, patient and surgical characteristics, complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 1717 patients and 2502 breasts reconstructed with polyurethane-coated implants. Mean follow-up across included studies was 12.3 months (range 1-60 months). Mean implant size was 327 cc (range 160-680 cc). Across all studies, implant loss occurred in 1.0% of cases and infection in 0.9%. Capsular contracture with reported Baker grade III-IV cases occurred in 1.0% of cases within ≤12 months of follow-up, increasing to 12.3% in studies with ≥36 months' follow-up. The most frequent aesthetic drawback was rippling or contour deformity, affecting 183 breasts (7.3%). Patient-reported satisfaction was consistently favorable: 5 studies using the BREAST-Q reported mean scores ranging from 72.6 to 78.3 for Satisfaction with Breasts and 79.9 to 84.6 for Psychosocial Well-Being. Pre-pectoral DTI reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implants is a safe and effective technique, associated with low complication rates and high patient satisfaction. Careful flap selection and adjunctive fat grafting optimize results. Prospective multicenter studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to confirm durability and refine patient selection criteria. Level of Evidence 3 Therapeutic:

Identifiers

PMID41451121
PMCPMC12730869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.