ReviewAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025
Post-Mastectomy Direct-to-Implant Pre-Pectoral Breast Reconstruction With Polyurethane-Coated Implants: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety.
Review in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changing Paradigms in Polyurethane-coated Breast Implant Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis of 4 Decades of Clinical Practice.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Pre-Pectoral Polyurethane Implant Reconstruction Following Batwing Skin-Reducing Mastectomy: A Single-Center Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pre-pectoral (PP) direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction has gained popularity as a muscle-sparing alternative to subpectoral techniques. Polyurethane-coated implants, with their unique mechanical and biological properties, may further optimize outcomes by reducing capsular contracture and improving implant stability. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and patient-reported outcomes of post-mastectomy PP DTI breast reconstruction using polyurethane-coated implants. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Data on study design, patient and surgical characteristics, complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 1717 patients and 2502 breasts reconstructed with polyurethane-coated implants. Mean follow-up across included studies was 12.3 months (range 1-60 months). Mean implant size was 327 cc (range 160-680 cc). Across all studies, implant loss occurred in 1.0% of cases and infection in 0.9%. Capsular contracture with reported Baker grade III-IV cases occurred in 1.0% of cases within ≤12 months of follow-up, increasing to 12.3% in studies with ≥36 months' follow-up. The most frequent aesthetic drawback was rippling or contour deformity, affecting 183 breasts (7.3%). Patient-reported satisfaction was consistently favorable: 5 studies using the BREAST-Q reported mean scores ranging from 72.6 to 78.3 for Satisfaction with Breasts and 79.9 to 84.6 for Psychosocial Well-Being. Pre-pectoral DTI reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implants is a safe and effective technique, associated with low complication rates and high patient satisfaction. Careful flap selection and adjunctive fat grafting optimize results. Prospective multicenter studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to confirm durability and refine patient selection criteria. Level of Evidence 3 Therapeutic:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.