ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025
Sentiment Analysis of Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Natural Language Processing and Deep Learning.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Use of autologous flaps for postmastectomy reconstruction has increased. Public forums offer large-scale patient narratives that can be analyzed with natural language processing (NLP) models, such as RoBERTa. Objectives: This study aims to assess patient-reported sentiment and emotions toward autologous reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP), transverse rectus abdominis myocutameous (TRAM), and latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps. Methods: Public reviews from RealSelf (Seattle, WA) referencing DIEP, TRAM, or LD flaps were collected. Two NLP models were applied: (1) a binary sentiment classifier (positive/negative) and (2) an emotion model scoring fear, sadness, anger, disgust, neutral, surprise, and joy; each review was labeled by its highest-scoring emotion. Results: Two hundred and twelve posts were analyzed: 153 DIEP, 20 TRAM, and 39 LD. DIEP had the highest mean positive sentiment (0.627); TRAM had the lowest (0.517). In the emotion model, "joy" was most common for DIEP (68/153; mean 0.389) and TRAM (7/20; mean 0.299). LD posts were most often "neutral" (9/39; mean 0.267). Conclusions: NLP of public patient reviews suggests DIEP flaps are the most discussed and are associated with more positive sentiment than TRAM or LD reconstructions. Emotion profiles indicate generally joyful narratives for DIEP, neutral for LD, and comparatively less positive for TRAM. This approach complements traditional outcomes research by capturing real-world patient experience at scale. Level of Evidence 3 Therapeutic:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.