ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2025
Improving U-Net Segmentation of Cutaneous Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Clinical Photographs with Semi-Supervised Training.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erythema and hyperpigmentation delineation for cutaneous chronic graft-versus-host disease using hyperspectral reconstruction.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Measuring skin involvement in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) currently requires expert manual assessment, which is costly, time-consuming, and shows high interrater disagreement (>20% surface area). In our previous work, automated image analysis showed promise for measuring affected skin area under controlled photography conditions. Our aim is to improve the performance of these methods in standard clinical photographs without the need for costly expert annotations using a semi-supervised approach. A baseline U-Net model was trained in a fully supervised manner using 360 3D photographs from 36 cGVHD patients, with expert-marked ground truth contours of affected skin. The model was then iteratively retrained by incorporating an additional 5648 unlabeled photographs from 83 new patients using a semi-supervised method. Testing on clinical photographs of 20 held-out patients, the median surface area error improved from 19.2% (interquartile range 6.3 - 33.8) at baseline to 10.2% (4.5 - 22.6) after retraining. Semi-supervised training therefore provides an effective method for translating a pre-trained U-Net segmentation model to standard clinical photographs, without the need for additional expert annotations. Such models could help standardize cGVHD assessment and tracking, alleviating the need for costly expert evaluations and providing a reliable tool that would significantly enhance the current standard of manual assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.