ArticlePublic health ethics2026
Living Relational Ethics: A Case Study of a COVID-19 Asymptomatic Testing Programme in Higher Education.
Article in Public health ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relational ethics gained increased attention as a guiding approach for public health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Highlighting the social features of viral transmission, such as shared risk, relational ethics emphasizes the importance of collective responses rooted in values of community solidarity, mutual obligation and equity. However, many discussions of relational ethics have remained largely normative rather than empirical in character. In this paper, we report a study of relational ethics in the context of a COVID-19 asymptomatic testing programme implemented at a UK university during the pandemic. Exploring how staff and students considered the exceptional ethical demands and dilemmas of the pandemic, we show that respondents discussed participation in the asymptomatic testing programme in relational terms. In particular, they emphasised the mutual dependencies of communal living, the risks of community transmission, expectations for institutional care and distributed responsibility to care for those most vulnerable to severe disease. Our empirical findings advance normative discussions of relational ethics by demonstrating the relevance of institutional context and social change, offering insights for future public health interventions premised on relational values.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.