SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Impact of anti-VEGF therapy on choroidal thickness in patients with retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retinal, Vascular, and Choroidal Remodeling After Non-Reperfused Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Longitudinal OCT Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To systematically review and analyze existing literature reporting changes in choroidal thickness at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months following anti-VEGF treatment in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods: A comprehensive literature search identified 16 eligible studies including a total of 545 patients and 547 eyes. Data were extracted on subfoveal choroidal thickness at baseline and at specified follow-up intervals. Meta-analyses were performed to assess pooled changes in choroidal thickness after treatment, and subgroup analyses were conducted based on anti-VEGF drug type and treatment regimen. Results: At 1- and 3-month follow-up, anti-VEGF therapy was associated with a significant reduction in choroidal thickness. By 12 months, choroidal thickness tended to return toward baseline levels, suggesting potential stabilization or structural adaptation. Subgroup analyses indicated that the effects on choroidal thickness may vary among different anti-VEGF agents, with ranibizumab and aflibercept showing significant early reductions, while bevacizumab demonstrated more delayed effects. Further subgroup analyses based on RVO type showed that at 1 month, choroidal thickness was significantly reduced in branch retinal vein occlusion patients, but not in central retinal vein occlusion patients, suggesting potential differences in drug response between RVO subtypes. However, given the limited number of studies within some subgroups, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Conclusion: In patients with RVO, anti-VEGF therapy appears to induce an early reduction in choroidal thickness, which tends to return toward baseline with longer follow-up. Subgroup analyses provided preliminary insights into the potential influence of different agents, disease subtypes, and treatment regimens. However, this study was limited by the small number of eligible studies and the heterogeneity of study designs. Therefore, the findings should be regarded as exploratory and interpreted with caution. Future prospective studies with larger sample sizes, standardized imaging protocols, and longer follow-up are needed to clarify the clinical relevance of choroidal thickness changes in RVO patients undergoing anti-VEGF therapy. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD 420251011228.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.