Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41451098›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Feasibility analysis of total quality management in medical quality management and its impact on work efficiency.

Peiyao Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peiyao ShiHospital Quality Management Office, Shenzhen Yantian District People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the feasibility of total quality management (TQM) in medical quality management (focusing on three dimensions: management work efficiency, medical service quality, and safety quality) and to evaluate its impact on the work efficiency of medical staff. Methods: TQM was introduced in January 2023, serving as the dividing point between the pre-management period (January-December 2022) and the post-management period (January-December 2023). Fifty medical staff members from the same cohort were chosen as study subjects. Comparisons were made between the pre- and post-management periods in terms of work efficiency (hospital culture development, reward and punishment mechanisms, communication and coordination mechanisms, environmental hygiene management mechanisms, and adverse event reporting mechanisms), medical service quality, staff satisfaction, safety quality (incidence of adverse events, unplanned returns to the operating room, qualification rate of medical device sterilization, incidence of infection events, and medical complaints), and overall medical quality (medical safety management, medical training management, and medical hygiene supervision). Data were analyzed using SPSS 29.0. Paired-sample Results: After TQM implementation, the work efficiency of medical staff significantly increased ( Conclusion: TQM is feasible and effective in medical quality management. Its implementation can enhance work efficiency and medical service quality among medical staff, improve satisfaction, strengthen safety quality, and comprehensively elevate overall medical quality.

Indexed as

medical quality assessmentmedical quality managementmedical service qualitysafety qualitytotal quality managementwork efficiency

Identifiers

PMID41451098
PMCPMC12728011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.