ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Enhanced risk prediction of femoral head osteonecrosis in the elderly: a comparative study of random forest and logistic regression models.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a degenerative joint disorder that frequently leads to structural collapse and impaired mobility, particularly in older adults. Early detection of associated risk factors is essential for timely intervention. This study aimed to compare the predictive performance of a Random Forest (RF) algorithm and a Logistic Regression (LR) model in identifying key contributors to ONFH in elderly patients. Methods: This retrospective study included 339 patients aged ≥ 75 years who received treatment at Shanxi Bethune Hospital from January 2017 to December 2023, with complete clinical and imaging records. Variables included demographics, bone mineral density, medication and lifestyle history, comorbidities, and radiographic findings. Patients were randomly allocated into training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts. Predictive models were developed using RF and LR, with performance assessed by accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Both models consistently identified corticosteroid exposure, reduced bone mineral density, prior femoral fractures, and advanced age as major risk factors. The RF model demonstrated superior performance (AUC = 0.896; accuracy = 83.5%; sensitivity = 82.4%; specificity = 84.3%) compared to the LR model (AUC = 0.797; accuracy = 75.0%; sensitivity = 72.0%; specificity = 76.0%). ROC analysis confirmed the RF model's enhanced discriminative ability. Conclusion: The RF algorithm outperformed traditional logistic regression in predicting ONFH among older adults, highlighting the potential of machine learning techniques to support early risk identification and improve clinical decision-making in orthopedic care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.