ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Determinants of professional identity among practitioners in China's hot spring-integrated care model.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify key determinants of professional identity among practitioners within China's Hot Spring Medical and Long-term Care Integration with Rehabilitation Services (HS-MLR) model-an emerging field facing distinct occupational challenges. Understanding these factors is critical for formulating targeted strategies to enhance workforce sustainability. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 221 practitioners across 26 provinces. Data included sociodemographic and occupational characteristics, and professional identity was assessed using a validated multidimensional scale. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified dimensions of identity. Univariate and multivariable stepwise ordinal logistic regression were used to identify independent predictors. Results: The cohort was predominantly female (57.0%) and relatively young (90.1% aged 26-45 years), with only 16.4% holding a bachelor's degree or above. EFA revealed two dimensions of professional identity: Professional Value Recognition and Professional Practice Commitment. Multivariable analysis showed that continuing education as an independent predictor of Value Recognition, while perceived treatment effectiveness, social impact, and model acceptance predicted Practice Commitment. Overall, only 47.1% of respondents reported a satisfactory or higher level of professional identity. Conclusion: Professional identity among HS-MLR practitioners remains moderately low. Key determinants include continuing education, perceived therapeutic efficacy, social value, and belief in the model. A dual-pathway interventions strategy-enhancing continuous professional development and reinforcing perceived social and clinical value-is recommended to improve workforce sustainability and service quality in this emerging sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.