ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Maternal and neonatal outcomes in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: a retrospective case-control study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of neutrophil extracellular traps in antiphospholipid syndrome.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The combination of low-dose aspirin (LDA) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the standard of care for obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS), significantly improving live birth rates. However, whether this regimen fully normalizes the pregnancy course and mitigates risks for both the mother and the neonate remains unclear. This study aimed to systematically evaluate whether significant maternal and neonatal morbidity persists in OAPS patients despite successful treatment and live birth. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 256 OAPS patients, including 166 criteria OAPS patients (C-OAPS-patients who fulfilled both the clinical and laboratory criteria of the Sydney criteria) and 90 non-criteria OAPS patients (NC-OAPS-patients who fulfilled only the clinical or only the laboratory criteria of the Sydney criteria) who achieved live birth, along with 768 matched healthy controls. We compared basic characteristics, laboratory parameters, and perinatal outcomes between the groups. Results: Compared to healthy controls ( Conclusion: Despite standard treatment, OAPS patients who deliver successfully remain at an increased risk for persistent maternal hypercoagulability and adverse neonatal outcomes. These findings underscore the need for a paradigm shift in management-from merely ensuring live birth to safeguarding neonatal health through proactive, multidisciplinary perinatal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.