ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Long-term clinical value of the anterolateral thigh perforator flap in the repair of limb soft tissue defects: A case series.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the long-term clinical value of the anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap in the repair of limb soft tissue defects. Methodology: This retrospective analysis included clinical records of 62 patients with limb soft tissue defects who received ALT perforator flap treatment at Guigang People's Hospital from January 2020 to October 2024. The defect area ranged from 8×6 cm to 28×15 cm. The arteries, veins and sensory nerves of the perforator flap were microanastomosed with the corresponding structures of the recipient area and the donor area was directly sutured in one stage. Patients were followed up eight months to five years after surgery. Results: Postoperative follow-up ranged from 8~60 months (average 32.9 ± 13.4 months); 59 cases of skin flaps survived completely, with a success rate of 95.2%. Three patients had reported complications: one case had localized necrosis at the edge and two cases had full-thickness necrosis, which healed after debridement and skin grafting. The skin flap donor site was directly sutured without the occurrence of fascial compartment syndrome. The microcirculation of the surviving skin flap was good, the color coordinated with the surrounding tissues and the texture was flexible. Three patients underwent secondary volume reduction plastic surgery due to the large volume of the reconstruction area, which affected their function. The postoperative contour was satisfactory. Conclusions: Long-term follow-up has confirmed that the ALT perforator flap can be used as a reconstruction treatment plan for soft tissue defects in limbs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.