Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450993›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025

Efficacy of laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy on stress response and urodynamic status in patients with early cervical cancer.

Ping Gong, Haitao Wang, Yuanjing Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ping GongPing Gong, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, P.R. China.
Haitao WangHaitao Wang, Department of Urology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, P.R. China.
Yuanjing WangYuanjing Wang, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100026, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the impact of open abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) on stress response and urodynamic status of early cervical cancer (CC) patients. Methodology: Clinical data of 115 patients with early-stage cervical cancer (CC) who underwent surgery at Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, between December 2021 and June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the surgical approach, patients were divided into the ARH group (n = 59) and the LRH group (n = 56). Perioperative status, stress response, and urodynamic indicators before and after the surgery, and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The perioperative indicators (surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, anal exhaust duration, number of dissected lymph nodes, and the length of hospital stay) of patients in the LRH group were better than those of the ARH group ( Conclusions: Compared with ARH, LRH for early CC provides greater benefits in the early postoperative period, including a lower stress response and better improvement in short-term urodynamic indicators.

Indexed as

Abdominal radical hysterectomyEarly cervical cancerLaparoscopic radical hysterectomyStress responseUrodynamic status

Identifiers

PMID41450993
PMCPMC12728713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.