ReviewMechanobiology in medicine2026
Mechano-regulation of cancer cell memory in tumor progression and therapy.
Review in Mechanobiology in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unmasking phenotypic heterogeneity and extracellular matrix architecture in neuroblastoma through orthotopic xenograft modeling.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- The Dynamic Alliance of p53 and Metabolism in the Tumor Microenvironment Shapes Tumor Evolution.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Sono-Mechanogenetics: Linking Ultrasound Physics With Cellular Mechanobiology.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Transformative biomechanics and mechanobiology breakthroughs shaping the future of health and medicine.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Review
- Obesity and Cancer: From Systemic Metabolic Reprogramming to Immunotherapy Paradox.Metabolites · 2026Review
- Gold Nanoplatforms for Phenotypic Reprogramming and Closed-Loop Theranostics of Cancer Stem Cells.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- The paracrine effects of tumor cells on endothelial cells and macrophages in brain metastases with different primary sites.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer cell memory, the ability to retain responses to prior environmental stimuli, has emerged as a key driver of tumor progression, therapeutic resistance, and immune evasion. Mechanical cues within the tumor microenvironment (TME), including matrix stiffness, viscoelasticity, and compressive stress, are increasingly recognized as critical regulators of such memory. These biophysical inputs not only influence immediate cellular behavior but also induce long-lasting transcriptional, epigenetic, and phenotypic changes that sustain cancer cell aggressive traits. In this review, we specifically highlight mechanobiology in shaping cancer cell memory. We summarize how extracellular matrix (ECM) composition and remodeling encodes mechanical inputs into stable gene expression programs that promote tumor progression, and highlight how mechano-regulated plasticity, membrane tension, chromatin remodeling, and epigenetic changes govern self-renewal, differentiation, and drug and immune resistance, underscoring how physical suppression contributes to chemo-, radio-, and targeted therapies failure. We further discuss emerging mechano-targeted strategies, including ECM-degrading agents, sonogenetic engineered cells, and stiffness-responsive nanoparticles, that seek to rewire cancer cell memory and improve treatment outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.