ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2025
Diagnostic utility of IBEX Bone Health for assessment of osteoporosis from knee radiographs.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knee-specific bone quality assessment for cementless total knee arthroplasty candidate selection: a narrative review.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study reports testing of IBEX Bone Health (IBEX BH) software, applied following acquisition of knee digital radiographs (DRs). IBEX BH analyses the DR to measure areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and T-scores. This study investigates aBMD and T-score at the knee as a biomarker to identify patients at high risk of osteoporosis. Methods: A 497-participant single-centre, non-randomised, prospective study was carried out comparing a) IBEX BH, a quantitative digital radiography software device, to b) Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). Participants underwent left and right knee DRs, and knee, pelvis and lumbar spine DXA scans. Analysis evaluates the efficacy of IBEX BH as a knee densitometry device, comparing performance to that of reference standard DXA at the same anatomical site. It further evaluates the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) performance of IBEX BH in predicting osteoporosis, defined by clinical reports from hip and/or spine DXA. This is compared against DXA referral recommendations derived from National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) guidelines, which use 10-year fracture risk calculated by the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) without neck of femur (NoF) aBMD. Results: Correlations between IBEX BH aBMD and DXA aBMD at the same anatomical sites were 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.90, 0.93]) for the proximal tibia (PT) and 0.87 (95%CI [0.84, 0.89]) for the distal femur (DF). For the PT and DF, the AUC for IBEX BH for discriminating central osteoporosis was 0.91 (95%CI [0.87, 0.95]) and 0.88 (95%CI [0.82, 0.93]) respectively, compared to 0.93 (95%CI [0.9, 0.97]) and 0.92 (95%CI [0.88, 0.96]) for DXA. In operating point analysis, the sensitivity and specificity to central osteoporosis of PT IBEX BH T-score was 0.66 95%CI [0.50, 0.78] and 0.94 95%CI [0.89, 0.96] respectively, compared to a sensitivity and specificity of 0.66 95%CI [0.50, 0.79] and 0.69 95%CI [0.63, 0.75] respectively for NOGG referral thresholds based on FRAX without NoF aBMD. Conclusion: Ibex BH shows strong correlation to DXA at the same anatomical site, and superior ability to FRAX without NoF aBMD for classifying central osteoporosis. Results demonstrate the potential utility of IBEX BH as a densitometer and opportunistic osteoporosis screening tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.