ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Development of a non-human primate model for preclinical research of a novel auditory nerve implant.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pilot Chronic Evaluation of a Slanted Electrode Array as an Auditory Nerve Implant.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cochlear implant is a widely available hearing restoration technology that can provide speech understanding in quiet environments. This technology struggles however, in noisy settings or situations involving multiple speakers. The primary cause of these performance limitations is a poor neural interface, in which the bony wall of the cochlea separates the electrode surface from the auditory nerve fibers, thus causing unwanted current spread and non-specific frequency activation. This study utilizes an alternative auditory prosthetic technology (auditory nerve implant, ANI) that enables direct auditory nerve stimulation, which provides a potentially superior neural interface and enables more precise targeting of auditory nerve fibers than traditional cochlear implants. As auditory nerve implants progress towards clinical translation, new implant designs and stimulation strategies will be created. Animal models to efficiently test and iterate through these new designs will be useful for the continued development of ANI technology. We present a viable surgical approach in the non-human primate (rhesus macaque) along with electrophysiological results that demonstrate robust activation of the auditory system at low current levels via intraneural stimulation. Our findings indicate that the rhesus macaque, which possesses an inner ear anatomy more similar to the human compared to other animal models used in the hearing field (e.g., rodents, felines and ferrets), has strong potential as a useful preclinical testbed involving an upright head model for future ANI prototypes and stimulation strategy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.