ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Soil phototroph community resilience comes from down under.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the implementation of crustivoltaics inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- The natural history of a biocrust architect, the cyanobacterium Microcoleus vaginatus.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Seed banks are widely recognized as means of recovery following disturbance across diverse ecosystems, including soil. Phototrophic microbes, while common in surface soils, have not been considered within this context. Methods: We subjected a variety of topsoil photosynthetically-driven communities (biocrusts) to severe disturbance by scalping off the surface layer, thereby exposing the undercrust. We collected samples from the biocrust layer, the undercrust layer, and again the recovering biocrust layer after a 4-month period. Samples were analyzed for biopigments (chlorophyll a and scytonemin) and 16S rRNA gene copies and its sequence diversity. Results: Ribosomal gene counts and pigment analyses revealed consistently rapid recovery, as much as 52% content in 4 months. Recovery could be traced to dormant cyanobacterial "seeds" in the undercrusts. Alternative pathways for recovery, including natural or interventional inoculation and lateral spread, did not constitute a comparable force. Discussion: Our findings bring soil phototrophs within the ecological framework linking seed banks to resilience following disturbance. The overlooked role of undercrusts in prior research invites a reinterpretation of past studies and may inform new restoration strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.