Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450946›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Soil phototroph community resilience comes from down under.

Brian Scott, Ferran Garcia-Pichel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessing the implementation of crustivoltaics inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian ScottCenter for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Ferran Garcia-PichelCenter for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Seed banks are widely recognized as means of recovery following disturbance across diverse ecosystems, including soil. Phototrophic microbes, while common in surface soils, have not been considered within this context. Methods: We subjected a variety of topsoil photosynthetically-driven communities (biocrusts) to severe disturbance by scalping off the surface layer, thereby exposing the undercrust. We collected samples from the biocrust layer, the undercrust layer, and again the recovering biocrust layer after a 4-month period. Samples were analyzed for biopigments (chlorophyll a and scytonemin) and 16S rRNA gene copies and its sequence diversity. Results: Ribosomal gene counts and pigment analyses revealed consistently rapid recovery, as much as 52% content in 4 months. Recovery could be traced to dormant cyanobacterial "seeds" in the undercrusts. Alternative pathways for recovery, including natural or interventional inoculation and lateral spread, did not constitute a comparable force. Discussion: Our findings bring soil phototrophs within the ecological framework linking seed banks to resilience following disturbance. The overlooked role of undercrusts in prior research invites a reinterpretation of past studies and may inform new restoration strategies.

Indexed as

biocrustmicrobial seed banksphototrophsoil microbiome resilienceundercrust

Identifiers

PMID41450946
PMCPMC12727951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.