Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450894›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2025

Enhanced Risk Stratification in Infective Endocarditis Surgery: A Comprehensive External Validation of All Available Mortality Prediction Scores.

Elisa Mikus, Diego Sangiorgi, Simone Calvi, Mariafrancesca Fiorentino, Elena Tenti, Flavia Dalle Mura, Carlo Savini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elisa Mikus *Cardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2892-8700
Diego Sangiorgi *Cardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-6666-3480
Simone CalviCardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy.
Mariafrancesca FiorentinoCardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy.
Elena TentiCardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy.
Flavia Dalle MuraDepartment of Experimental Diagnostic and Surgical Medicine (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Carlo SaviniCardiovascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Several prognostic models have been developed to estimate operative mortality in patients undergoing surgery for infective endocarditis (IE). However, their external validity and performance remain uncertain, limiting clinical applicability. This study aimed to externally validate and compare the performance of contemporary IE-specific and generic cardiac surgery (EuroSCORE II) risk scores in a large single-center cohort. Methods: Eighteen operative IE-specific risk scores, along with EuroSCORE II, were retrospectively applied to a database of 689 patients undergoing cardiac surgery for IE. Discrimination was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), while calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, Brier score, and calibration slopes/intercepts. For each score, the type of validation reported in the original study was critically examined, noting that validation was not always performed. Additionally, the inclusion of IE-specific variables, such as pathogen type and valvular complications, was assessed to evaluate the reliability and clinical applicability of each score. Results: Among the 689 patients, 30% were female, with a median age of 69 years. The most frequent pathogens were Streptococcus (26%), Staphylococcus aureus (18%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (18%), and Enterococcus faecalis (16%). Operative mortality was 10.6% (n = 73). The RISK-E score showed the highest discrimination (AUC: 0.742), followed by APORTEI (0.734) and modified MELD-XI (0.730). All scores demonstrated good calibration, with scaled Brier scores above 0.8. Scores incorporating IE-specific variables generally performed better, while several widely used generic scores, including EuroSCORE II, overestimated operative risk. External validation revealed lower AUCs for many scores compared to original reports, highlighting the importance of rigorous evaluation. Conclusion: The RISK-E score demonstrated the highest discriminative ability and satisfactory calibration for predicting operative mortality in patients undergoing surgery for infective endocarditis. These results support the role of externally validated, IE-specific prognostic tools in guiding clinical assessment and selecting appropriate perioperative strategies.

Indexed as

external validationinfective endocarditismortalityrisk score

Identifiers

PMID41450894
PMCPMC12728560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.