ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Open reduction versus closed reduction percutaneous pinning for the treatment of song type V lateral humeral condyle fractures in children. A short term report.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) in the treatment of Song V lateral humeral condyle fractures in children. Methods: Medical records of pediatric patients who underwent surgical treatment for lateral humeral condyle fractures at our institution from July 2018 to August 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria: (1). Age ≤14 years; (2). Time from injury to surgery ≤3 days; (3). Song V lateral humeral condyle fracture. Exclusion criteria: (1). Open fracture or concomitant fractures; (2). Associated neurovascular injury; (3). Pathological fracture or concomitant metabolic diseases; (4). Incomplete clinical or radiological data; (5). History of previous surgery on the ipsilateral elbow. Patients meeting the criteria were divided into two groups based on surgical approach: open reduction ( Results: The mean age in the closed reduction group was 4.87 ± 1.55 years, compared to 4.53 ± 1.57 years in the open reduction group, showing no statistically significant difference ( Conclusion: Closed reduction percutaneous pinning fixation for Song V lateral humeral condyle fractures achieves surgical outcomes comparable to open reduction. However, CRPP offers the advantages of minimal scarring and significantly shorter operative time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.