ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Characteristics of pediatric interventional drug trials registered between 2015 and 2024 on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study comprehensively analyzed the characteristics and development trends of pediatric interventional drug clinical trials registered between 2015 and 2024, with a focus on pharmaceutical characteristics such as dosage form and administration route. Methods: The ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched to identify trials involving pediatric participants. Interventional trials first posted between 2015 and 2024 were included if they used drugs as interventions and had treatment as the primary purpose. Results: A total of 2,928 pediatric-only clinical trials were included, with annual registration numbers ranging from 257 to 339, exhibiting a declining trend. Among these, 1,975 (67.5%) enrolled no more than 100 participants, and 153 (5.2%) were restricted to either males or females, with this gender-specific enrollment correlated with disease epidemiology. Mental, behavioral, or neurodevelopmental disorders (319, 10.9%) represented the most studied therapy area, maintaining high proportions consistently across Phases 1-3. The most common dosage forms were liquid (53.3%) and solid (24.0%), and the most frequently reported administration routes were enteral (39.0%) and parenteral (35.6%). Drug formulations and administration routes varied by age group: the use of solid formulations (from 12.1% to 29.1%) and enteral administration (from 22.9% to 42.0%) increased with age, while the use of liquid formulation and parenteral administration declined. Conclusion: In the last ten years, registered pediatric drug trials have either stayed stable or slightly decreased, often featuring small sample sizes and rarely using age-specific formulations. National regulatory bodies should boost policy support to encourage pediatric drug research and improve trial design quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.