ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2025
Enhancing polyreactivity prediction of preclinical antibodies through fine-tuned protein language models.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Efficient inference of non-polyreactive antibody variants dependent on local fine-tuning.mAbs · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have garnered significant attention for their efficacy in treating a variety of diseases. However, some candidate antibodies exhibit non-specific binding to off-target proteins or other biomolecules, leading to high polyreactivity, which can compromise therapeutic efficacy and cause other complications, thereby reducing the approval rate of antibody drug candidates. Therefore, predicting the polyreactivity risk of therapeutic mAbs at an early stage of development is crucial. In this study, we fine-tuned six pre-trained protein language models (PLMs) to predict the polyreactivity of antibody sequences. The most effective model, named PolyXpert, demonstrated a sensitivity (SN) of 90.10%, specificity (SP) of 90.08%, accuracy (ACC) of 90.10%, F1-score of 0.9301, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.7654, and an area under curve (AUC) of 0.9672 on the external independent test dataset. These results suggest its potential as a valuable in-silico tool for assessing antibody polyreactivity and for selecting superior therapeutic mAb candidates for clinical development. Furthermore, we demonstrated that fine-tuned language model classifiers exhibit enhanced prediction robustness compared with classifiers trained on pre-trained model embeddings. PolyXpert can be easily available at https://github.com/zzyywww/PolyXpert.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.