ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Healthy community-living older adults' experiences with using a specially adapted virtual reality exercise game to promote physical activity-a pilot study.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immersive technologies such as virtual reality (VR) that has been developed the recent years, are now increasingly accessible and offers new opportunities for VR environments combined with games that may enhance physical activity. However, these games may require adaptation and further customization for use among older users. In this pilot study, we investigate the experiences of older adults using a head-mounted VR exercise game that was developed in close collaboration with end users. Methods: We included ten community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years and older who undertook six VR exercise sessions across a two-week period, each session lasting 15 min. Descriptive information included age, gender, mobility (Timed Up and Go test, TUG), and gait speed (10 m walk test), and daily steps from ankle-worn accelerometers. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim and analyzed by use of reflexive thematic analysis. Results: We included four men and six women, age range from 66 to 77 years, with an average gait speed of 1.4 m/sec and an average TUG-time of 7.6 s. Their average activity levels were close to 4200 steps per day. After the trial period, participants' experiences were that VR is a new and exciting development. They found VR to be more of a game than exercise, and they suggested integrating more challenging activities, physical movement and social engagement to enhance the exercise part of the game. They did not feel that the game facilitated any more physical activity in their daily lives. Discussion/conclusion: VR is a promising tool that older adults in this trial enjoyed, but the game was not physically demanding enough for the participants. Future adaptations should include more challenges. Game development should focus on tasks that keep players interested and engaged over longer times, without jeopardizing safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.