Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450849›Full record

ArticlePatch-based techniques in medical imaging : 4th international workshop, Patch-MI 2018, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Granada, Spain, September 20, 2018 : proceedings. Patch-MI (Workshop) (4th : 2018 : Granada, Spain)2018

Multi-atlas Parcellation in the Presence of Lesions: Application to Multiple Sclerosis.

Sandra González-Villà, Yuankai Huo, Arnau Oliver, Xavier Lladó, Bennett A Landman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patch-based techniques in medical imaging : 4th international workshop, Patch-MI 2018, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Granada, Spain, September 20, 2018 : proceedings. Patch-MI (Workshop) (4th : 2018 : Granada, Spain), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandra González-VillàInstitute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Ed. P-IV, Campus Montilivi, 17003 Girona, Spain.
Yuankai HuoElectrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
Arnau OliverInstitute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Ed. P-IV, Campus Montilivi, 17003 Girona, Spain.
Xavier LladóInstitute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Ed. P-IV, Campus Montilivi, 17003 Girona, Spain.
Bennett A LandmanElectrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Controlling Quality and Capturing Uncertainty in Advanced Diffusion Weighted MRIR01EB017230 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2015 to 2024
$5.1M
GPU-Accelerated Parallel Computer for Drug Discovery ApplicationsS10OD020154 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, JARROD ANSON · 2015 to 2015
$225k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017230NIH HHS S10 OD020154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensity-based multi-atlas strategies have shown leading performance in segmenting healthy subjects, but when lesions are present, the abnormal lesion intensities affect the fusion result. Here, we propose a reformulated statistical fusion approach for multi-atlas segmentation that is applicable to both healthy and injured brains. This method avoids the interference of lesion intensities on the segmentation by incorporating two

Indexed as

Brain parcellationMultiple sclerosisSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41450849
PMCPMC12737794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.