ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2025
The Medical Segmentation Decathlon without a Doctorate.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Segmentation of anatomical structures leverages medical imaging technology for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. Recent advances in active learning offer the opportunity for the interactive creation of artificial intelligence (AI) segmentation algorithms. Although active learning has been extensively investigated retrospectively, prospective studies have not been widely reported. This study aimed to determine whether a novice in medical imaging could independently label anatomical structures using Radiopaedia, 20% of clinician-generated labels for education of the novice, and AI guidance. Given the pancreas and spleen challenges from the Medical Segmentation Decathlon (MSD), a novice employed the MONAI Label extension on 3D Slicer with active learning (AL) techniques to perform segmentation. This study also explored the use of MONAI (Medical Open Network for AI) Label, a user-friendly framework for label submission and model training. Our segmentation results yielded Dice scores comparable to the range of those from the 2018 segmentation challenges of the MSD. We achieved Dice scores of 0.209 for the pancreas task using 70 images and 0.831 for the spleen using 34 images. The pancreas results do not fall within MSD's reported ranges for the L1 region which is 0.48-0.80. However, the spleen results fall within the MSD's reported range of 0.83-0.97. The interactive AI framework by MONAI Label effectively segments as we reached reasonable performance in less than a month with one person without clinical expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.