ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Decoding the cross-immune pressure: Dengue's role in SARS-CoV-2 evolution.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteomic signals are not equal clinical phenotypes: redefining evidence standards in arbovirus-SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactivity.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Dengue-SARS-CoV-2 interactions: immune crosstalk, variant emergence, and clinical outcomes.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence suggests that dengue virus (DV) antibodies (Abs) and SARS-CoV-2 Abs were cross-reactive, resulting in reciprocal serological cross-interaction and providing cross-protection in populations in co-endemic regions. It became apparent from the present study that SARS-CoV-2 variants were preferentially selecting mutation(s)/deletions in the spike to evade interaction with DV Abs. We looked at mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and how they affected the antigenicity, focusing on successively emergent major variants such as B.1.1.7 (Kent), B.1.617 (Delta), B.1.617.2.1 (Delta-Plus), B.1.1.529 (Omicron-BA.1) and B.1.1.529 (Omicron-BA.2). In order to further elucidate the effect of cross-reactive DV Abs on SARS-CoV-2 spike mutation(s), structural studies and docking simulations were performed using DV-2 envelope (E) Abs and binding free energies were calculated. The above studies revealed that majority of the signature mutation (s) in spike variants appeared to be predominantly influenced by DV Abs compared to immune selection due to SARS-CoV-2 (preceding variants) or other selection pressures. This was supported by the observed and highly specific cross-binding of pre-pandemic DV Ab-positive serums to synthetic peptides in ELISA, designed from certain regions of the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD). These RBD regions showed maximum cross-interactions with DV E Abs in docking simulations. In agreement with our previous findings, the aforesaid highly cross-reactive human DV Abs also showed cross-neutralization potential in a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization test, suggesting that they could indeed impart selection pressure on SARS-CoV-2. Above findings were further supported by our previous observation that the lately emergent SARS-CoV-2 variants like Omicrons (2022-23) were nearly 50 % less cross-reactive to DV compared to preceding strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.