Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450844›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

A formal approach to the hierarchical structures of microbial communities with negative interactions.

Beatrice Ruth, Bashar Ibrahim, Peter Dittrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beatrice RuthDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Fürstengraben 1, Jena, 07743, Germany.
Bashar IbrahimDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Fürstengraben 1, Jena, 07743, Germany.
Peter DittrichDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Fürstengraben 1, Jena, 07743, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial communities typically consist of numerous species that coexist through intricate mutual dependencies. Understanding the structure of these communities and the interactions among their species is essential for explaining their functions and predicting their behavior. In this study, we follow the idea that a community organizes itself into a hierarchy of potentially persistent sub-communities. Previously, this hierarchy was described using Chemical Organization Theory (COT). However, that approach did not account for negative interactions. Here, we enhance the theory by incorporating negative interactions through an inhibitory resource called a toxin. For simplicity, we assume that a taxon sensitive to a toxin cannot coexist with a taxon that produces that toxin. Our results demonstrate that introducing a toxin reduces the number of organizations, with the extent of this reduction depending on various modeling parameters. Further, we show that the usage of essential resources leads to a computationally NP-hard transformation problem into direct taxa interactions. Additionally, we demonstrate that the number of measurements required to infer all persistent subspaces increases. We determine which groups of species are mutually excluded due to toxin interactions. Besides toxic interactions, it is also possible to infer cross-feeding aspects of the microbial community, for which a potential algorithm is outlined and illustrated by an example.

Indexed as

Chemical organization theoryInhibitory resourceMicrobial communitiesNegative interactionsPersistent subspace

Identifiers

PMID41450844
PMCPMC12731272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.