Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450842›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

A look at the free-viewing paradigm in eye-tracking research to assess positive attentional bias.

Thomas Suslow, Dennis Hoepfel, Taavi Wenk, Anette Kersting, Vivien Günther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas SuslowDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Dennis HoepfelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Taavi WenkDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Anette KerstingDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Vivien GüntherDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention orientation toward positive stimuli may have mood-protective or mood-enhancing effects. Eye-tracking is an increasingly administered method to assess biased attention allocation and maintenance. In the present paper, we point to an underestimated but reliable method of eye-tracking research for measuring positive attentional bias and its temporal dynamics: the free-viewing paradigm. To date, few free-viewing eye-tracking studies have specifically examined positive attentional biases in healthy individuals. Against this background, we summarize findings from clinical and subclinical eye-tracking research using free viewing in healthy control groups. We discuss the observed time courses of positive attentional biases during experimental trials, which vary depending on type and number of presented stimuli, and make recommendations on which experimental conditions appear to be favorable for capturing dynamic time courses of positive attentional biases. We identify various individual difference factors that may influence the magnitude of positive attentional biases and should be considered in future studies. Time course analyses of eye-tracking data offer the opportunity to learn more about the time of onset and extent of increase in attention to positive information during free viewing and their relationships to individual difference variables. Directions for future research on positive attentional biases are discussed.

Indexed as

attentionemotion regulationeye-trackingfree viewingpositive attentional biaspositive moodtime-course of bias

Identifiers

PMID41450842
PMCPMC12727642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.