Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450829›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

A pilot randomized controlled trial to examine the impact of a therapy dog intervention on loneliness in adult patients hospitalized in a psychiatric unit.

Nancy R Gee, Lisa Townsend, Erika Friedmann, Sandra B Barker, Tushar P Thakre, Megan K Mueller

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05089201 (A Pilot Study to Examine the Impact of a Therapy Dog Intervention on Loneliness and Related Health Outcomes in Vulnerable Populations), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05089201 nacompletednot on this map

A Pilot Study to Examine the Impact of a Therapy Dog Intervention on Loneliness and Related Health Outcomes in Vulnerable Populations

TypeinterventionalSponsorVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRan2021 to 2024Enrolled72ConditionsLoneliness, Depression, Anxiety, Quality of LifeArmsAnimal-assisted interaction, Conversational control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nancy R GeeCenter for Human-Animal Interaction, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Lisa TownsendCenter for Human-Animal Interaction, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Erika FriedmannDepartment of Organizational Systems and Adult Health, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Sandra B BarkerCenter for Human-Animal Interaction, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Tushar P ThakreDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Megan K MuellerDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: Loneliness has been linked to a number of health threats and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality risks among people with mental illness. Loneliness fully mediates the relationship between societal stigma and depression as well as thoughts of self-injury and is a precursor to suicide attempts and relapse in people with substance misuse disorders. Research design and methods: Individuals hospitalized for the treatment of mental illness (N = 60) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: dog + handler intervention (AAI), handler only conversational control (CC), or usual care (UC) for 20 minutes per day for three days. An Analog scale and two versions of the UCLA loneliness scale (UCLA-SF and UCLA-LS) were used to assess loneliness. Linear Mixed Models with random intercepts were applied to compare changes in loneliness between conditions pre/post daily intervention sessions, pre/post 3-day intervention phase (days 2-4), and baseline to post-intervention (days 1-5). Results: Loneliness decreased significantly more in the AAI group relative to the CC or UC groups in daily pre/post intervention sessions, and over the course of the 3-day intervention for all participants ( Discussion and implications: These results indicate that AAI was effective for reducing loneliness in people who are hospitalized for the treatment of mental illness. These results support and extend previous research and suggest that AAI has the potential to be effective as an adjunctive treatment for loneliness among people hospitalized for mental illness. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT05089201.

Indexed as

animal-assisted interventionlonelinesspsychiatric in-patientstherapy dogwell-being

Identifiers

PMID41450829
PMCPMC12728353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.