Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450826›Full record

ArticleCurrent genomics2025

Characterization and Genomic Analysis of

Ekaterina Korsakova, Yulia Nechaeva, Elena Plotnikova, Olga Yastrebova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ekaterina KorsakovaLaboratory of Microbiology of Technogenic Ecosystems, Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganism UB RAS, Perm, Russia.
Yulia NechaevaLaboratory of Microbiology of Technogenic Ecosystems, Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganism UB RAS, Perm, Russia.
Elena PlotnikovaLaboratory of Microbiology of Technogenic Ecosystems, Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganism UB RAS, Perm, Russia.
Olga YastrebovaLaboratory of Microbiology of Technogenic Ecosystems, Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganism UB RAS, Perm, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Phthalic acid esters (PAEs) are widely used chemical compounds in various industries. However, PAEs are also a major source of pollution in soil and aquatic ecosystems, posing a significant environmental threat. Microbial degradation is a very effective way to remove phthalic acid esters from a polluted environment. Objectives: The aims of this study were to investigate the ability of the strain Methods: The ability of the strain SF27 to use DBP as the only source of carbon and energy was determined by cultivating it on a mineral medium containing 0.5-4 g/L DBP. The evaluation of the bacterial decomposition of DBP was carried out by GC-MS. The genome was annotated using the JGI Microbial Genome Annotation Pipeline (MGAP) (https://jgi.doe.gov/). Functional annotation was performed using various databases: KEGG, COG, NCBI, and GO. The Mauve program was used to compare the strain SF27 genome and the genomes of the closest DBP-degrading strains. Results: The strain Conclusion: Based on the conducted research, it can be stated that the strain

Indexed as

Arthrobacterdegradationdibutyl phthalategenomemetabolic pathwayspht gene clusterPhthalic acid esters

Identifiers

PMID41450826
PMCPMC12728591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.