Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450781›Full record

ArticlePragmatic and observational research2025

Relapse Predictors of Idiopathic Retroperitoneal Fibrosis: A Long-Term Cohort Study.

Sicheng Huang, Anqi Wang, Yimeng Jia, Wei Han, Nan Zhao, Tingting Wang, Weiguo Zhu, Lidan Zhao, Linyi Peng, Jiaxin Zhou and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pragmatic and observational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sicheng Huang *Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0005-4313-4759
Anqi Wang *Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yimeng Jia *Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Wei HanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Nan ZhaoInstitute of Clinical Medicine, National Infrastructures for Translational Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Tingting WangClinical Biobank, Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Science and Technology Key Infrastructure on Translational Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Weiguo ZhuDepartment of Primary Care and Family Medicine, Department of Medical Insurance Management, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Lidan ZhaoDepartment of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Linyi PengDepartment of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jiaxin ZhouDepartment of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Mengtao LiDepartment of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Wen ZhangDepartment of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yunyun FeiDepartment of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to identify predictive factors for the relapse of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (IRF) and provide instructions for the optimization of the maintenance therapy. Methods: All patients with a clinical diagnosis of IRF were enrolled and followed up every 3-6 months. Their clinical characteristics, laboratory data and treatment strategies were recorded at each visit. Results: 96 IRF patients (77 males and 19 females) with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range [IQR], 50-61) were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 2.50 (IQR, 1.75-4.13) years. During the follow-up, 21 patients experienced at least one relapse, with cumulative relapse rates of 10.6%, 32.3%, and 62.4% at 2.5, 5, and 7.5 years, respectively. Initial hydronephrosis was an independent predictor of relapse (Hazard ratio [HR], 5.35; p=0.001). Discontinuation of maintenance therapy (HR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.4-8.314; p=0.007) was closely associated with relapse. Use (HR, 0.12; p<0.001) and dose (HR, 0.73; p=0.01) of glucocorticoids (GC) in maintenance period were protective factors against relapse. Among patients with hydronephrosis, those who discontinued GC had a higher relapse rate (p=0.009). GC monotherapy or combined immunosuppressants (IM) therapy were more effective in preventing relapse than IM alone (p<0.001). Conclusion: Our study reveals that initial hydronephrosis and GC withdrawal during maintenance therapy are significant predictors of IRF relapse. Long-term, low-dose GC therapy is benefit for maintaining remission and preventing relapse, especially in patients with initial hydronephrosis.

Indexed as

cohort studiesglucocorticoids/therapeutic userecurrenceretroperitoneal fibrosisrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID41450781
PMCPMC12731247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.