ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Case Report: Laparoscopic management of penetrating liver injury from pneumatic nail gun.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foreign bodies in the liver are relatively rare, with most cases resulting from ingested objects that migrate through the gastrointestinal tract. Direct hepatic penetration by pneumatic tools represents an exceptionally rare mechanism of injury, as these foreign bodies typically require significant force to breach the abdominal wall and lodge within the liver parenchyma. Preoperative differentiation between migrated and directly penetrating foreign bodies is clinically significant, as it may influence both diagnostic approach and surgical planning. Here, we report the diagnosis and management of a 50-year-old male with an unusual case of pneumatic nail penetration into the left hepatic lobe. The patient presented with acute abdominal pain following accidental penetration by a 5.2 cm pneumatic nail that traversed the rectus abdominis to lodge in segment III of the liver. CT imaging confirmed the nail's trajectory while demonstrating no evidence of abscess formation or pneumoperitoneum. Vital signs and laboratory parameters remained stable throughout the clinical course. During exploratory laparoscopy, the foreign body was identified within the left hepatic lobe, confirming its direct penetration pathway rather than migratory origin. The nail was successfully extracted using careful laparoscopic dissection, with complete preservation of surrounding parenchyma and no significant bleeding. The patient experienced an uneventful recovery and was discharged on postoperative day 2 with complete resolution of symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.