Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450768›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Optimizing single-port thoracoscopic anatomical sublobar resection of the right upper lobe with computed tomography three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction technology: a retrospective cohort study.

Yang Tian, Baisheng Xie, Nannan Song, Jun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yang TianDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Baisheng XieDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Nannan SongDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jun WangDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the viability of assisting with single-port thoracoscopic anatomical sublobar resection of the right upper lobe of the lung using computed tomography three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction technology. Methods: From January 2021 to January 2024, 152 cases of single-port thoracoscopic anatomical sublobar excision of the right upper lobe of the lung were recorded in our hospital's Department of Thoracic Surgery. Depending on whether the 3D reconstruction technique was employed, the cases were split into two groups: one for 3D and one for 2D. The final analysis included 65 pairs (130 cases) of patients after applying 1:1 propensity score matching to compensate for baseline confounding factors. Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, margin distance, postoperative complications, and other perioperative indicators were all statistically examined and reported. Results: The 3D group had significantly shorter surgical times than the 2D group (111.0 ± 19.4 vs. 142.7 ± 11.4, Conclusion: Single-port thoracoscopic anatomical sublobar excision of the right upper lobe, utilizing 3D reconstruction technology, can significantly reduce surgical time, increase the surgical margin threshold, minimize hospital stays and chest tube retention times, and decrease perioperative surgical complications.

Indexed as

anatomical sublobar resectioncomputed tomography three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction technologyground glass nodulesublobes of the lungthoracoscope

Identifiers

PMID41450768
PMCPMC12727972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.