ReviewCureus2025
Insights and Constraints: Understanding the Boundaries in Investigating Otosclerosis and Endolymphatic Hydrops Interaction.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Otosclerosis and endolymphatic hydrops (EH) are distinct inner ear pathologies that may coexist within the same temporal bone, creating diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Their interaction remains controversial, with proposed mechanisms suggesting that otosclerotic involvement of the vestibular aqueduct or cochlear endosteum may obstruct endolymphatic flow, leading to secondary hydrops. This review summarizes current evidence on the coexistence, pathophysiology, diagnostic tools, and clinical implications of otosclerosis-associated EH. Histopathologic studies have demonstrated EH adjacent to otosclerotic foci involving the cochlear endosteum and the vestibular aqueduct, supporting a mechanical or metabolic interaction between both entities. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging, particularly gadolinium-enhanced 3D-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences, have allowed in vivo visualization of cochlear and vestibular hydrops, improving diagnostic accuracy and enabling earlier detection of mixed pathology. Clinically, affected patients often exhibit mixed or fluctuating hearing loss, tinnitus, and vertigo, suggesting both cochlear and vestibular compromise. Post-stapedectomy EH has also been described, likely secondary to altered perilymphatic pressure or microtrauma. Despite growing evidence supporting an association, the causal relationship remains uncertain - whether EH arises as a secondary consequence of otosclerosis or represents a concurrent process within a shared pathophysiological spectrum. The coexistence of EH and otosclerosis exemplifies the complexity of inner ear disorders, highlighting the need for integrated approaches combining imaging, audiovestibular testing, and histopathologic correlation. Multidisciplinary collaboration and longitudinal studies are essential to clarify underlying mechanisms, refine diagnostic criteria, and optimize management strategies for patients with combined otosclerotic and hydropic pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.