ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Examining caregiver-adolescent symptom agreement and its influence on treatment outcomes: a quantitative analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Caregivers play a critical role in identifying and interpreting adolescent mental health symptoms, yet their perceptions often differ from those of adolescents themselves. Such discrepancies can influence treatment engagement and outcomes, making it essential to understand the factors that affect caregiver-adolescent agreement in symptom reporting. Methods: This study analyzed baseline depression and anxiety symptom reports from 763 caregiver-adolescent dyads enrolled in a virtual intensive outpatient program. Agreement between adolescent self-reports and caregiver proxy reports was assessed using concordance analyses. Potential moderators included adolescent age, gender identity, race, neurodivergence, caregiver well-being, and family functioning. Additional analyses examined whether agreement predicted treatment outcomes, including symptom improvement and treatment completion. Results: Overall, caregiver-adolescent agreement was low to moderate (CCC = 0.215). Adolescents identifying as non-binary showed the largest discrepancies, typically rating their symptoms as more severe than their caregivers. Higher family functioning was associated with reduced directional disagreement for depression, though this pattern did not hold for anxiety. Dyads in which caregivers reported higher symptom severity than adolescents demonstrated greater symptom improvement by discharge, while agreement levels did not significantly predict treatment completion. Discussion: Informant discrepancies were common and clinically meaningful, particularly among gender-diverse adolescents and families reporting lower functioning. Although overall agreement did not predict treatment completion, caregiver perceptions of greater symptom severity were linked to greater reductions in adolescent depression and anxiety over treatment. These findings suggest that incorporating caregiver perspectives into assessment and treatment planning may enhance outcomes, especially in high-acuity virtual care settings. Future research should investigate mechanisms through which caregiver engagement influences adolescent symptom change over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.