Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450693›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The relationships between social media use, time management, and decision-making styles.

Hatice Şıngır

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hatice ŞıngırDivision of Guidance and Psychological Counseling, Department of Educational Sciences, Gazi Faculty of Education, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study examined the relationship between social media use, time management, and decision-making styles. The sample consisted of 612 participants, including 513 women (83.8%) and 99 men (16.2%), who were university students and young adults. Data were collected using a personal information form (age, gender, social media usage time, and academic achievement), the Time Management Scale, and the Melbourne Decision-Making Questionnaire. In addition to these measures, differences were analyzed concerning age, gender, academic achievement, and duration of social media use. Descriptive statistics, independent samples

Indexed as

decision-making stylesemerging adultssocial media usagetime managementundergraduate students

Identifiers

PMID41450693
PMCPMC12727978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.