ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Exploring motivational and contextual factors influencing medical career choice: a theory-informed study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From class consciousness to class suicide: considering community integration as a primary care ethic.Family medicine and community health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Career choice in medicine represents a multidimensional decision influenced by motivational, emotional, and sociocultural dynamics. Understanding how these factors interact is essential for developing educational environments that nurture sustained professional commitment. Drawing on the Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) and the Expectancy-Value Theory (EVT), this study explored how self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, task values, and contextual supports shape medical career motivation among first-year medical students. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative design was used, involving 297 first-year medical students at a public university in western Türkiye. Data were collected online and anonymously during the 2022-2023 academic year, using a researcher-developed and pilot-validated questionnaire comprising 33 items assessing motivational and contextual determinants of career choice. Questionnaire items were structured according to the constructs of SCCT and EVT. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses (t-tests, ANOVA, Results: Students' strongest motivations were intrinsic and self-efficacy-based-particularly personal desire to study medicine, belief in being a good physician, and moral satisfaction-corresponding to SCCT's self-efficacy and EVT's intrinsic value dimensions. Job security and professional prestige also received high ratings, reflecting positive outcome expectations and utility value. In contrast, environmental barriers (e.g., workload, media influence, and perceived low income) had comparatively lower influence. Female students reported higher intrinsic and altruistic motivations, whereas male students emphasized financial stability and outcome expectations. Parental education and age were also associated with higher efficacy and expectancy beliefs, aligning with SCCT's view of environmental support as a reinforcing factor. Conclusion: The findings suggest that intrinsic motivation and perceived competence outweigh external constraints in shaping early medical career intentions. Framing medical career choice through SCCT and EVT offers a comprehensive understanding of how emotional, motivational, and cultural factors intersect in professional identity formation. These insights can inform interventions that strengthen self-efficacy, moral engagement, and contextual support in medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.