ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The relationship between mobile phone addiction, bedtime procrastination, and campus-based physical activity: a longitudinal follow-up study based on a college student population.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the relationship between mobile phone addiction (MPA), bedtime procrastination (BP), and campus-based physical activity (CBPA) among university students, and to determine whether a "vicious circle" mechanism contributes to health risks, thereby providing a foundation for developing good habits and promoting the overall physical and mental health of university students. Design: Using the cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) and AMOS 26.0, the analysis was carried out in three steps: "controlling for stability effects - analyzing cross-time predictive paths-testing model fit" to explore the cross-time predictive pathways and mechanisms of action among MPA, BP, and CBPA, and to examine the longitudinal interaction relationships among these variables. Methods: Two longitudinal follow-up surveys of 376 university students at 3-month intervals using the Mobile Phone Addiction Scale, the Bedtime Procrastination Scale, and the Physical Activity Rating Scale (2025/03/10-2025/06/13). Results: (1) T1 MPA was significantly and positively correlated with T1 BP ( Conclusion: (1) There is preliminary longitudinal evidence that MPA and BP can mutually provide for each other and form a "vicious cycle" mechanism. (2) There is preliminary longitudinal evidence that MPA provides for CBPA. (3) There is preliminary longitudinal evidence that CBPA provides for BP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.