ArticleJACS Au2025
Osmolyte Structural and Thermodynamic Effects Across the Protein Folding Landscape.
Article in JACS Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- PDBTools.jl: A Lightweight and High-Performance Julia Package for Molecular Structure File Handling and Analysis.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Preferential Solvation by Trifluoroethanol Drives α-Helical Folding in the Disordered S2 Region of the Escargot Protein.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026Article
- OsmoFold: A high-throughput tool for predicting the impact of osmolytes on protein structure.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, the structure and thermodynamics of urea and trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) preferential interactions across the complete folding landscape of the β-sheet SRC Homology 3 (SH3) domain and the helical B domain of protein A (BdpA) are characterized. There is a high correlation between preferential interactions and the surface area of the denatured states, despite the chemical nature of the exposed surfaces upon denaturation differing from those of native states. For SH3, the denaturation always proceeds with an increase in surface area, such that the qualitative effect of cosolvents on the stability of all denatured states can be inferred from the preferential interactions in the native state. On the other hand, for BdpA, partially denatured states exist that are destabilized by urea; thus, unfolding pathways can be modulated by the cosolvent. Both urea and TMAO form hydrogen bonds with the proteins, which are on average weakened upon denaturation, and nonspecific interactions, which are strengthened in unfolded structures. Backbone, side chain, and specific residue contributions to distribution functions are obtained, illustrating, for instance, the crucial participation of urea-backbone and nonpolar-cosolvent interactions in the solvation mechanisms, on a residue basis. Obtaining these results was possible using a novel computational pipeline to represent solvation structures throughout complete folding landscapes by means of coarse-grained and atomistic simulations and, crucially, the analysis of solvation using minimum-distance distribution functions and the Kirkwood-Buff solvation theory. Cosolvent effects on transfer free energies match experimental data within 1 kcal mol
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.