Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450654›Full record

ReviewJACS Au2025

The Current Toolbox for Covalent Inhibitors: From Hit Identification to Drug Discovery.

Mengke You, Hong Liu, Chunpu Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JACS Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. RSC chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mengke YouState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.
Hong LiuState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3685-6268
Chunpu LiState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3000-0728

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Covalent modification of therapeutic targets has emerged as a powerful platform for creating clinical drugs and chemical probes. Covalent drugs have evolved from serendipitous discoveries to rationally designed therapeutics, driven by advances in electrophile-first screening technologies. This perspective takes stock of alternative technologies currently available in laboratories and industry that collectively enable targeted covalent inhibitor development across historically "undruggable" targets. We highlight five such technologies: activity-based protein profiling (ABPP), provides functional proteomic mapping to identify ligandable residues; covalent tethering, exploits dynamic chemistry to capture transient pockets; covalent DNA-encoded libraries, leverages trillion-member libraries for multiresidue targeting; phage/mRNA display, which facilitates evolution of covalent macrocyclic peptides; and sulfur-(VI) fluoride exchange (SuFEx), engages residues beyond cysteine. Integration of these approaches with chemoproteomics and artificial intelligence accelerates the discovery of covalent inhibitors with enhanced selectivity and reduced off-target risks. This technological convergence establishes a new paradigm for precision covalent therapeutics, offering innovative solutions to overcome drug resistance and target challenging protein interfaces.

Indexed as

covalent inhibitordrug designelectrophile screeningtechnology convergenceundruggable targets

Identifiers

PMID41450654
PMCPMC12728628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.