ArticleJACS Au2025
Investigating Polarity Effects in DNA Base Stacking.
Article in JACS Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fibers and Double-Layered Tubes Formed From a Single Self-Complementary DNA Oligonucleotide.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Beyond the Single Molecule: Multiplexed Methods in Force Spectroscopy.Annual review of biophysics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nucleic acid structures are stabilized by both base pairing and base stacking. While energetics of base pairing interactions are relatively well established, our understanding of the energetic contributions of base stacking remain incomplete. Here, we use a combination of single-molecule and computational biophysics approaches to investigate the effect of strand polarity on base-stacking energetics. We designed pairs of DNA constructs with reversed stacking polarities at nick sites, along with corresponding no-stack controls to isolate stacking contributions. Performing single-molecule force-clamp assays with a Centrifuge Force Microscope (CFM), we observed polarity-dependent differences in stacking energetics. These differences were most pronounced in purine-purine and certain purine-pyrimidine interactions. Notably, a 5' purine stacked on a 3' pyrimidine was generally more stable than the reverse polarity. We employed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to observe stacking interfaces in the DNA constructs. The simulations were qualitatively consistent with our experiments, and showed positional differences between opposite polarity stacking pairs, giving some insight into the origin of these polarity differences. Overall, these results demonstrate that base polarity can modulate stacking stability and should be considered when designing short duplex regions such as overhangs in molecular biology and biotechnology applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.