Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450630›Full record

ArticleJACS Au2025

A Machine Learning Interatomic Potential Data Set and Model for Catalysis with Local Fine-Tuning to Chemical Accuracy.

Zhihong Wu, Lei Zhou, Pengfei Hou, Yuyan Liu, Ruixing Wang, Taoli Guo, Jin-Cheng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACS Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhihong WuCenter for Rare Earth and Inorganic Functional Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering & National Institute for Advanced Materials, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China.
Lei ZhouCenter for Rare Earth and Inorganic Functional Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering & National Institute for Advanced Materials, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China.
Pengfei HouCenter for Rare Earth and Inorganic Functional Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering & National Institute for Advanced Materials, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China.
Yuyan LiuCenter for Rare Earth and Inorganic Functional Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering & National Institute for Advanced Materials, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China.
Ruixing WangCenter for Rare Earth and Inorganic Functional Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering & National Institute for Advanced Materials, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3462-7894
Taoli GuoCenter for Rare Earth and Inorganic Functional Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering & National Institute for Advanced Materials, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China.
Jin-Cheng LiuCenter for Rare Earth and Inorganic Functional Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering & National Institute for Advanced Materials, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7215-8307

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterogenous catalysis involves complex reactions with dynamic changes in catalyst morphology, challenging the capabilities of traditional density functional theory (DFT) methods. To address this, we introduce the catalytic large atomic model (CLAM), a comprehensive data set and pretrained model for machine learning interatomic potential, specifically designed for heterogeneous catalysis. CLAM is trained on a diverse data set that includes metal and alloy slabs with adsorbates, oxides, clusters, two-dimensional materials, and small molecules, ensuring high accuracy across a wide range of catalytic systems. Additionally, we introduce a "local fine-tuning" algorithm, which substantially improves the accuracy of machine learning interatomic potentials for structural optimizations and transition state searches. This approach achieves 94% prediction accuracy within chemical accuracy thresholds (<1 kcal/mol) for adsorption energies of small adsorbates on transition metal surfaces, while demonstrating 3.4× computational acceleration relative to conventional DFT calculations. Furthermore, the method maintains comparable performance in transition state searches, delivering 81% identification accuracy (<1 kcal/mol) with a 10.1× speed-up compared to standard DFT-based CI-NEB approaches. Furthermore, the pretrained CLAM model can accurately reproduce reported dynamic catalysis phenomena via molecular dynamics simulations without additional fine-tuning.

Indexed as

density functional theorylarge atomic modellocal fine-tuningmachine learning potentialmolecular dynamics

Identifiers

PMID41450630
PMCPMC12728600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.