ArticleKansas journal of medicine
Improving Prophylactic Antibiotic Selection for Type 3 Open Fractures in the Trauma Setting.
Article in Kansas journal of medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this quality improvement study was to implement a standardized prophylactic antibiotic protocol for type 3 open fractures and to evaluate changes in both subjective comfort and objective knowledge of open fracture management among trauma team personnel. Methods: A simplified protocol for antibiotic selection in open fractures was developed and implemented at two regional Level 1 trauma centers. We used pre-intervention surveys to assess participants' ability to select the preferred antibiotic regimen for open fracture clinical scenarios and their comfort with open fracture management. The intervention consisted of instructional posters displayed in trauma bays showing the Gustilo classification for open fractures and the approved prophylactic antibiotic regimen for each fracture type. After a six-week intervention period, unmatched post-education survey responses were compared with pre-intervention responses using Fisher's Exact Test or the Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact Test, with significance set at p <0.05. Results: Participants included 16 orthopedic residents and 18 trauma staff members. The proportion of respondents who reported being very comfortable selecting antibiotics for type 3 open fractures increased from 6% to 68% (p <0.001). Correct identification of the preferred antibiotic regimen across three clinical scenarios involving type 3 open fractures increased by an average of 58%, with all improvements reaching statistical significance (p <0.001). Conclusions: Implementation of a simplified antibiotic prophylaxis protocol, reinforced with instructional posters in the emergency department, significantly improved participants' knowledge and confidence in antibiotic selection for type 3 open fractures. These findings support the adoption of standardized treatment algorithms in trauma care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.