ArticleKansas journal of medicine
Post-Operative Pain After Orthopedic Surgery: A Comparative Study Between the United States and Ethiopia.
Article in Kansas journal of medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Post-operative pain management varies across healthcare systems and cultural contexts. While opioids are central in the United States, many countries rely on non-opioid strategies due to limited access or cultural norms. Authors of this study compared pain management strategies and outcomes among orthopedic trauma patients at academic centers in the United States and Ethiopia. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients undergoing orthopedic trauma surgery at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (Ethiopia) and the University of Kansas Health System (United States) between May and October 2022. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores at 24 and 48 hours post-operatively, analgesic use, and demographics were analyzed. Results: Ethiopian patients often were more male, younger, and had lower body mass indexes and fewer comorbidities (e.g., obesity, diabetes, smoking) than United States patients. Despite receiving fewer analgesics and no post-operative nerve blocks, Ethiopian patients reported lower VAS pain scores at both 24 and 48 hours. In the United States cohort, patients with nerve blocks had lower pain scores than those without; however, both groups reported higher scores than Ethiopian patients. In the United States, pain scores correlated positively with the number of analgesics administered. Conclusions: Ethiopian patients reported better pain control despite fewer interventions, suggesting that systemic, demographic, and cultural factors may strongly influence postoperative pain experiences. These findings underscore the importance of context-sensitive approaches to pain management and highlight the need for further research to inform equitable, effective strategies across diverse settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.