Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450549›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Exploring the interplay between diet, obesity, mental health, and the gut microbiota: the MIND-GUT intervention study, study protocol.

Deborah Gustafson, Elisabet Rothenberg, Steinn Steingrimsson, Hanne Krage Carlsen, Fabrizio Belloni, Nagalakshmi Eruvuri, Rajna Knez, Erika Olsson, Robert D Burk, Hellas Cena and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Deborah GustafsonDepartment of Neurology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, United States.
Elisabet RothenbergDepartment of Nursing and Integrated Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Steinn SteingrimssonDepartment of Psychiatry for Affective Disorders, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Hanne Krage CarlsenSection of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Fabrizio BelloniSchool of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.
Nagalakshmi EruvuriSchool of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.
Rajna KnezDepartment of Psychiatry for Affective Disorders, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Erika OlssonDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Robert D BurkDepartments of Pediatrics, Microbiology & Immunology, Epidemiology & Population Health, and Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.
Hellas CenaLaboratory of Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Rachele De GiuseppeLaboratory of Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Gianluca TognonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Obesity and mental health disorders often co-occur, contributing to individual suffering and healthcare costs. Diet plays a key role in both weight management and mental wellbeing and may influence these through its impact on the gut microbiota. However, the mechanisms linking diet, obesity, and mental health remain insufficiently understood. Aim: We propose to conduct the MIND-GUT study in Sweden to evaluate feasibility as primary outcome (retention, adherence, and acceptability) of a 12-week dietary intervention based on the MIND diet and, as secondary outcomes, the influence of the latter on weight loss and mental wellbeing in adults with overweight and obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m Methods: In this randomized trial, 126 adults with obesity will be assigned to either an intervention group following a MIND diet or a control group receiving general dietary advice. Energy intake targets will be <2,300 kcal/day for men and <1,900 kcal/day for women. The primary outcomes are retention, adherence, and intervention acceptability (the latter assessed through qualitative interviews). Secondary outcomes include changes in body weight, BMI, waist and hip circumferences, fat mass, and mental health including perceived stress, depression, and anxiety symptoms. Gut microbiota diversity and composition will be analyzed from stool samples collected at baseline and 12-week follow-up. Discussion: This study will offer valuable insights into the relationship between diet, mental health, obesity, and the gut microbiota. Results will inform the design of future large-scale trials assessing the MIND diet's potential as a strategy for improving physical and mental health.

Indexed as

anxietyBMIdepressiongut microbiotamental wellbeingMIND dietobesity

Identifiers

PMID41450549
PMCPMC12731245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.