Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450530›Full record

ArticleBMJ neurology open2025

Cerebellar ataxias and functional movement disorders: navigating clinical overlap.

Friedrich Erdlenbruch, Andreas Thieme, Christel Depienne, Dagmar Timmann, Stoyan Popkirov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ neurology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Friedrich ErdlenbruchDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0654-836X
Andreas ThiemeDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Christel DepienneInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Dagmar TimmannDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Stoyan PopkirovDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Functional movement disorders (FMDs) are commonly classified along canonical non-ataxic movement disorder patterns, creating a potential blind spot for frequently observed ataxia-like presentations. At the same time, normal diagnostic findings and episodic symptom variability in some cerebellar ataxias predispose to an incorrect FMD diagnosis. Cases: We present three cases that illustrate pitfalls in the differential diagnosis of ataxia. First, a patient treated for presumed immune-mediated cerebellar ataxia was diagnosed with FMD based on clinical signs. Next, a patient with intermittent and inconsistent symptoms was diagnosed with FMD after extensive exclusionary workup, but was then found to have a novel type of spinocerebellar ataxia. The third patient had a genetically confirmed spinocerebellar ataxia but developed additional functional motor symptoms. Conclusion: Differentiating cerebellar ataxias from FMDs and recognising mixed presentations is essential. Enhanced clinical awareness and systematic diagnostic evaluation are crucial to avoid misdiagnosis and ensure optimal treatment.

Indexed as

CEREBELLAR ATAXIAFUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGICAL DISORDER

Identifiers

PMID41450530
PMCPMC12730797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.