ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Mentorship in field epidemiology training programs in the eastern mediterranean region: mentors' characteristics, perceived challenges, and training needs.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite its significance, mentorship within Field Epidemiology Training Programs (FETP) remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess the demographic and professional profiles of FETP mentors, their mentorship practices, challenges, and training needs within the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR). Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among FETP mentors across nine EMR countries. A structured questionnaire, developed with expert input and pre-tested for clarity, covered demographics, challenges, training needs, satisfaction, and perceived impact. Data were collected via an online survey platform. Results: Of 148 mentors approached, 129 responded (87.2%). Most were male (75.2%) and aged 40-50 years (41.1%). Over half (51.1%) had more than 6 years of professional experience, while 38.0% had only 0-2 years of mentoring experience. Epidemiology (50.4%) and public health (31.0%) were the most common fields. Most (74.4%) had formal mentorship training, though only 47.3% did so recently. Time management was a common challenge, with 68.0% of mentors reporting difficulty managing time for mentorship activities either often or sometimes. Nearly half (49.2%) found available resources adequate to support their mentorship role. The majority (93.0%) expressed a need for more training, especially in mentoring techniques, communication, and leadership. Workshops were identified by 94.6% of respondents as the preferred method for mentor training. Overall, 59.7% rated their mentorship experience as "Good" and 27.1% as "Excellent." Conclusion: The study findings underscore the need for structured mentor development, clear guidelines, dedicated time, and enhanced support to strengthen FETP mentorship and public health capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.