Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450500›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Psychometric validation of the WHO-5 and WHO-4 well-being index scales for assessing psychological well-being and detecting depression in Japanese school-aged children: a community-based study.

Masaki Adachi, Michio Takahashi, Hiroyuki Mori, Tomoko Nishimura, Makoto Osada, Minami Adachi, Rei Monden, Manabu Wakuta, Kazuhiko Nakamura

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Masaki AdachiDepartment of Psychology, Meiji Gakuin University, Tokyo, Japan.
Michio TakahashiResearch Department, Institute of Child Developmental Science Research, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hiroyuki MoriResearch Department, Institute of Child Developmental Science Research, Shizuoka, Japan.
Tomoko NishimuraResearch Department, Institute of Child Developmental Science Research, Shizuoka, Japan.
Makoto OsadaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki University, Aomori, Japan.
Minami AdachiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki University, Aomori, Japan.
Rei MondenGraduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Manabu WakutaResearch Department, Institute of Child Developmental Science Research, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kazuhiko NakamuraDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki University, Aomori, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is widely used to assess psychological well-being, but its psychometric properties in younger populations, particularly in non-Western settings, remain underexplored. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the WHO-5 (WHO-5-J) and a culturally adapted four-item version (WHO-4-J), which excludes a culturally sensitive item ("I have felt cheerful and in good spirits") and uses a simplified four-point Likert scale to minimize cognitive burden among Japanese school-aged children. Methods: Data were collected from a large community-based sample of 6,983 students aged 10-15 years (Grades 4-9) in Hirosaki City, Japan. We evaluated the factorial validity and internal consistency of the WHO-5-J and WHO-4-J using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Measurement invariance across age and gender groups was examined with multi-group confirmatory factor analyses. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were conducted to determine optimal cutoff scores for detecting psychological distress. Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the factorial validity and internal consistency of both the WHO-5-J (α = 0.84-0.88; ω = 0.86-0.91) and WHO-4-J (α = 0.82-0.88), confirming their unidimensional structures. Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated full scalar measurement invariance across age and gender groups. Receiver operating characteristic analyses identified optimal cutoff scores with area under the curve values ranging from 0.80 to 0.85, indicating good diagnostic accuracy for psychological distress. Discussion: Overall, the WHO-4-J demonstrated psychometric properties comparable to those of the WHO-5-J, supporting its practical utility as a culturally appropriate tool for assessing psychological well-being and screening for depression in Japanese youth. These findings underscore the importance of cultural adaptation and developmentally appropriate scaling for accurately assessing psychological well-being in diverse, non-Western child populations.

Indexed as

DepressionMental HealthPsychometricsStudentsAdolescentChildEast Asian PeopleFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansJapanMalePsychological Well-BeingReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesWorld Health Organizationcommunity sampleconfirmatory factor analysiscross-cultural validationdepression screeningmeasurement invariancepsychological well-beingschool-aged childrenWHO-5 well-being index

Identifiers

PMID41450500
PMCPMC12727617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.