Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450460›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025

The Adverse Impact of Delay Upon Successfully Completing the National Registry EMT Exam on the First Attempt.

Peter G Kreysa, Linda Martinez, Henry O'Lawrence

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter G KreysaDepartment of Family and Consumer Sciences, California State University Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, USA.
Linda MartinezDepartment of Health Care Management, California State University Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, USA.
Henry O'LawrenceDepartment of Health Care Management, California State University Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) provide lifesaving care to sick and injured patients. After completing a state-approved course with cognitive and psychomotor training, EMT certification requires passing the National Registry computer-based adaptive exam. This study examined whether delays in taking the exam are associated with failure and provides context on the EMT role and certification process in the United States. Methodology: Data included pass/fail results from 714 students who completed EMT courses between January 2013 and June 2025 at a large public university in Los Angeles County, California. All courses used similar curricula, equipment, facilities, instructors, and competencies. The study analyzed first-attempt exam outcomes relative to the time elapsed between course completion and testing. Findings: Students who tested within 15-45 days had comparable pass rates, with the highest success among those testing within 30 days. Passage rates declined significantly after 45 days, and delays beyond 60 days were strongly associated with failure. These results indicate that the best chance of passing occurs when the exam is taken within 1-45 days of course completion. Originality: This study demonstrates that delaying the National Registry EMT exam increases the likelihood of failure, particularly after 60 days. The findings can guide administrators and instructors in advising students to minimize delays and may inform curriculum adjustments to support long-term knowledge retention.

Indexed as

certification delaycognitive assessmenteducational advisingemergency medical technicianexam timinglicensure outcomespsychomotor trainingstudent performance

Identifiers

PMID41450460
PMCPMC12729021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.