ReviewClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2025
Bimekizumab for Hidradenitis Suppurativa from Trials to Real Life: A Review of the Published Literature.
Review in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuropathic Pain Management Using Novel Biologics in Moderate-to-Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating inflammatory disorder of the hair follicles affecting areas rich in apocrine glands. Moderate-to-severe forms often require biologic therapies, including bimekizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits IL-17A and IL-17F. Secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting IL-17A, and adalimumab, an anti-TNFα monoclonal antibody and the first biologic approved for HS, also represent established therapeutic options, reducing inflammatory lesions and pain with variable long-term response among patients. Approved in Europe and the USA in 2024 for HS, bimekizumab has shown promising efficacy in the BE HEARD I and II clinical trials, with significantly higher HiSCR response rates compared to placebo and improvements sustained through 48 weeks; the BE HEARD EXT extension study confirmed durable benefits at two years, with reduced disease severity and improved quality of life. This review included six studies (two trials, three case series, and one case report), highlighting consistent results in real-world settings, though limited by the drug's recent introduction. Observational studies reported significant reductions in IHS4, pain, and DLQI scores, with complete remission in some cases. The most frequent adverse events were mucocutaneous candidiasis, generally mild and manageable. Dual inhibition of IL-17A and IL-17F represents an innovative therapeutic approach for HS, with potentially greater efficacy than selective inhibitors. However, further large-scale, long-term real-world data are needed to confirm the drug's safety and effectiveness and to define the optimal role of bimekizumab in HS management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.