ReviewCureus2025
The Impact of Exercise on Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although physical activity is known to improve outcomes in non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), its effect on metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains unclear. This study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the association between exercise and overall survival (OS) among patients with mCRC. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published from 2000 to September 2025. Eligible studies evaluated exercise or physical activity in adults with histologically confirmed mCRC and reported survival outcomes. Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS were pooled using a random-effects model. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and heterogeneity was evaluated with the I² statistic. Four prospective cohort studies comprising 2020 patients met the inclusion criteria. Exercise types were predominantly mild to moderate aerobic activities such as walking or light household chores. The pooled HR for OS was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.48-0.87), indicating a 36% reduction in mortality among physically active patients compared with those who were inactive. Heterogeneity was substantial (I²=74.5%), but the direction of effect was consistent across studies. All studies were of moderate to high quality (NOS 7-8). Funnel plot analysis showed mild asymmetry, suggesting possible publication bias. Mild to moderate physical activity is significantly associated with improved OS in patients with mCRC. Even low-intensity activities such as walking may offer survival benefits and are feasible for patients with advanced disease. These findings support the incorporation of moderate exercise into multidisciplinary care for mCRC, although the observational nature of the available studies limits the ability to draw causal inferences. Large-scale prospective trials are warranted to determine optimal exercise regimens in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.