ArticleCureus2025
Inter- and Intra-examiner Reliability of Quantitative Assessment of Respiratory Muscle Cross-Sectional Areas on Preoperative Chest CT Images: A Pilot Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRespiratory sarcopenia, defined as reduced respiratory muscle mass and strength, and has been reported as a potential prognostic factor in lung cancer. In patients undergoing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgery, preoperative chest computed tomography (CT) is routinely performed and offers an opportunity to assess respiratory muscle volume. However, the reliability of CT-based measurements for different respiratory muscles has not been established, and standardized protocols are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of respiratory muscle volume measurements using preoperative CT images in patients with lung cancer.
methodsFive patients who underwent lung cancer surgery at our hospital between July and August 2023 were selected. Four physical therapists with no prior experience in measuring muscle cross-sectional areas (CSAs) on chest CT images received a lecture on the measurement methods from a radiology technician. Respiratory muscle CSAs (pectoralis, intercostal, and latissimus dorsi muscles) were measured from preoperative chest CT images using an image analysis system. Measurements were performed four times on different days. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were used for intra- and inter-rater reliability assessments, applying a two-way mixed-effects model with absolute agreement: ICC (2, 1) for intra-rater and ICC (2, k) for inter-rater reliability. ICC ≥ 0.75 indicated excellent reliability.
resultsParticipants had a median age of 75.0 (72.0, 79.0) years and body mass index of 23.0 (20.0-24.0). Four participants (80%) were at tumor stage I. Excellent intra-assessor reliability was demonstrated for all the respiratory muscles (pectoralis CSA [ICC: 0.908 to 0.996], intercostal CSA [ICC: 0.941 to 0.985], and latissimus CSA [ICC: 0.885 to 0.984]). Excellent inter-rater reliability was demonstrated for the pectoralis and intercostal CSAs.
conclusionsThis study confirmed excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability for measuring respiratory muscle CSAs using CT images in patients with preoperative lung cancer in the pectoral and intercostal muscles. This suggests that CT assessment of respiratory muscle volume may be widely used as a clinically useful indicator. Further standardization and simplification of this method will allow its use in broader clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.